BY MARTIN LUSH | GxP AI IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST
During my human error prevention workshops, I emphasise:
Human error is the consequence, rarely the cause, of deviations. It should be the starting point of an investigation - RARELY its conclusion.
Why? Because human error is a very complex problem with multiple contributing factors, never a single 'Root Cause'. So don't waste time investigating individual incidents. Using AI, we achieved an estimated 80% reduction in human error deviations in just six months, saving 4,000 hours of effort. How? By focusing resources on prevention not reaction.
We identified key indicators of potential errors - those moments when problems are just waiting to happen. Here’s the list we used, based on real-world experience:
Not all indicators carry the same weight. Each characteristic was assigned a priority score (out of 10) based on its impact on error likelihood. This made it clear where to focus our energy.
Here’s where the magic happens. We used a Large Manufacturing Model (LMM), a predictive AI system, to answer this specific question:
“Which manufacturing area is most at risk of human error? Use the weighted data to identify where preventive action will have the biggest impact.”
The AI analysed our data, designed an algorithm and flagged areas where errors were likely to emerge. These insights gave us a precise starting point for intervention and prevention.
No AI system is perfect without human expertise. We validated the AI’s findings, refined the algorithm and pinpointed an area ripe for improvement. The results were staggering.
A four-person task force trained in our six step simplification process spent just five days addressing the top three contributing factors:
The outcome? A 4,000-hour reduction in resource use and a leap in on-time delivery from 72% to 98%. By prioritising prevention over reactive investigation we achieved more with less.
Here’s how you can take the first step toward transforming your human error prevention approach:
Brainstorm contributing factors: What signs indicate errors waiting to happen in your processes? Engage as many people as possible. Would you add anything to my list?
Leverage AI wisely: AI is a powerful co-worker, but the quality of your results depends on how you frame the problem. Let me know if you need help with 'prompting'.
Validate AI outputs: Never take predictions at face value. Refine and test the results. LLMs can lie. Critically think about the outputs. Never blindly accept.
Focus on simplification: Even small changes in process and SOP design can yield massive results.
Celebrate wins: Prevention saves time, resources, and stress. Every win is worth a party